Moral ContextsMany contexts shape and limit moral thinking in philosophy and life. Human conditions of vulnerability and interdependency, of limited awareness and control, of imperfect insight into ourselves and others are inevitable contexts that neither moral thought nor theory should forget. To be truly reflective, moral thinking and moral philosophy must become aware of the contexts that bind our thinking about how to live. This collection of essays by Margaret Urban Walker seek to show how to do this, and why it makes a difference. Contingent and changeable contexts that shape moral thinking include our individual histories, our social positions, and institutional roles, relationships, cultural settings, and social arrangements, and the specific moral idioms we pick up along the way. The paradigms and specialized language of ethical theory are contexts, too; they shape how moral theory looks and what or whom it looks at. Ethical theory and practice are meaningless without these Moral Contexts. |
Kullanıcılar ne diyor? - Eleştiri yazın
Her zamanki yerlerde hiçbir eleştiri bulamadık.
Diğer baskılar - Tümünü görüntüle
Sık kullanılan terimler ve kelime öbekleri
accept actual agents alternative applied arguments authority beliefs Cambridge certain claim commitments common conception concern consider construction context continue critical cultural defined deliberation depend discussion distinctive emotions epistemology equality ethicist ethics example expectations experience expression fact feelings feminist forms gender give human idea ideal images imagine important individual institutional interests judgements kind knowledge less limited live matter meaning moral knowledge moral luck moral philosophy moral theory moral understanding natural normative particular philosophers picture political position possible practices principles problem question R. M. Hare reality reason recognition reflective relations relationships relevant requires resentment respect responsibility role scientific sense shared situations slaves social society sort specific standards standing structure studies suggest things thinking thought tion trust understanding University Press values voice women York