Dogma of the Immaculate Conception, p. 20.
personal infallibility, p. 20. The Vatican Council, p. 21.
Newman's letter to Ullathorne, p. 21; Janus, p. 22. Origin
of the Old Catholics, p. 22; their inconsistency, p. 24.
Changes in Roman Catholic text-books made necessary by
Vatican Council, p. 25. Bailly's Theology, p. 25. Keenan's
Catechism, p. 26. Roman Catholics acknowledge that the
Bible alone furnishes no sufficient basis for their system, p. 28;
in this they differ from early Fathers, p. 29. Bellarmine's rule
respecting tradition, p. 29. Jewel's challenge, p. 29.
Newman's Essay on Development, pp. 31-44; anticipations
of the theory, p. 31; applications of it, p. 32; it completely
abandons the old defence made by R. C. advocates, p. 33.
The Council of Trent, Milner, Wiseman, p. 33. Veneration
for the Fathers traditional in Roman Church, p. 34; this
veneration not consistent with theory of Development, p. 35.
The controversy between Bossuet and Jurieu, p. 35. The
theory of Development then maintained by the Calvinist, p. 35;
and also by Petau, p. 36. Bossuet's opposition to the theory,
p. 36. Bishop Bull's great work, p. 36. Newman's Essay
doubtfully received at first, p. 37. A Romanist advocate
strongly tempted to accept it, p. 38. Newman on Invocation
of the Virgin, p. 38. The doctrine of Development concedes
what the opponents of Romanism assert, p. 39; useless to
Romanists if not supplemented by doctrine of Infallibility,
p. 39. The doctrine of Development would equally serve to
justify Protestantism, p. 40. Great historical difficulty in the
way of the doctrine, p. 40. Local limitation of alleged de-
velopments, p. 41. Superiority of Protestant developments,
p. 41. Manning and Spurgeon, p. 43.
Roman Catholic line of argument, p. 44.