Culture and Social Theory

Ön Kapak
Transaction Publishers - 324 sayfa

Aaron Wildavsky, along with Mary Douglas, identified what they called grid-group theory. Wildavsky began calling this "cultural theory," and applied it to an astounding array of subjects. The essays in this volume exemplify the theory's potential contributions to three seemingly disparate, but related, areas: the social construction of meaning, normative/analytic political philosophy, and a theory of rational choices. This book is the first in a series of Aaron Wildavsky's collected writings being published posthumously by Transaction. Wildavsky selected, sequenced, and grouped all but three of the essays included in Culture and Social Theory prior to his death. Some are presented here for the first time. Wildavsky's cultural theory provides ways to organize and interpret the world.

In the first section, he shows how social scientists, particularly economists and sociologists, apply the theory. Wildavsky argues that concepts such as externalities, public goods, altruism, and even risk and rape are tools of rival, ubiquitous cultures engaged in perpetual struggle with one another. The second section deals with cultural theory as a way to interpret the works of normative and analytic political philosophers, including Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill, on competing human objectives. Wildavsky argues that particular types of interaction among a society's cultures are necessary for effective realization of basic concepts such as democracy. In the third section, Wildavsky applies cultural theory in conjunction with instrumental rationality, the former as a theory of preference formation, the latter as a device for realizing preferences efficiently. High-priority objectives, and thus the character of norms and rational action, shift across cultures. The world and its various elements comprise a complex, frequently changing, and thus ambiguous reality, nowhere more so than in the dynamic contours of the United States. For cultural theory, individualistic, hierarchical, and egalitarian interpretations of the world are the only ones capable of forming and sustaining institutions and related patterns of social relations that will support human social groups.

Wildavsky's central objective is to strip away the camouflage and to reveal varying domains of social life as fields of cultural competition. Culture and Social Theory will be a necessary addition to the libraries of political scientists, economists, and policymakers, not to mention all those who admire Aaron Wildavsky and his work.


Kullanıcılar ne diyor? - Eleştiri yazın

Her zamanki yerlerde hiçbir eleştiri bulamadık.

Seçilmiş sayfalar


Economists and the Social Construction of Distinctions
Why the Traditional Distinction between Public and Private Goods Should be Abandoned
At Once Ubiquitous and Elusive the Concept of Externalities is Either Vacuous or Misapplied
Accounting for the Environment
The Social Construction of Cooperation Egalitarian Hierarchical and Individualistic Faces of Altruism
If Institutions Have Consequences Why Dont We Hear about Them from Moral Philosophers?
Thomas Hobbes and His Critics Interpretive Implications of Cultural Theory
The Multicultural Mill
Cultural Pluralism Can Both Strengthen and Weaken Democracy
Social Scientists SelfInterest and Rational Choice
Why SelfInterest Means Less Outside of a Social Context Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices
Can Norms Rescue Selfinterest or Macro Explanation be Joined to Micro Explanation?
Culture Rationality and Political Violence
Cultural Change Party Ideology and Electoral Outcomes
Telif Hakkı

Democracy as a Coalition of Cultures

Diğer baskılar - Tümünü görüntüle

Sık kullanılan terimler ve kelime öbekleri

Popüler pasajlar

Sayfa 10 - Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton University Press 1963) Bernard C.
Sayfa xxi - What might have been is an abstraction Remaining a perpetual possibility Only in a world of speculation. What might have been and what has been Point to one end, which is always present.

Kaynakça bilgileri