was known that the play, on account of its popularity, had been chosen for performance before the King. One of these passages seems to have been the following, which may have had reference to the crowds attending the arrival of James I. in London, not very long before "Measure for Measure was acted at Whitehall: "and even so The general, subject to a well-wish'd King, Steevens quoted a passage from “ a True Narration of the Entertainment" of the King on his way from Edinburgh to London, printed in 1603, where it is said, "he was faine to publish an inhibition against the inordinate and dayly accesse of people comming." Taken with the context, the lines above quoted read like a complimentary insertion. We may, therefore, arrive pretty safely at the conclusion, that "Measure for Measure" was written either at the close of 1603, or in the beginning of 1604. "Measure for Measure"" was first printed in the folio of 1623; and exactly fifty years afterwards was published Sir William Davenant's "Law against Lovers," founded upon it, and upon "Much Ado about Nothing." With some ingenuity in the combination of the plots, he contrived to avail himself largely, and for his pose judiciously, of the materials Shakespeare furnished. pur Of "Measure for Measure," Coleridge observes in his "Literary Remains," ii. 122: "This play, which is Shakespeare's throughout, is to me the most painful, say rather, the only painful part of his genuine works. The comic and tragic parts equally border on the Monrέor the one being disgusting, the other horrible; and the pardon and marriage of Angelo not merely baffles the strong indignant claim of justice (for cruelty, with lust and damnable baseness, cannot be forgiven, because we cannot conceive them as being morally repented of), but it is likewise degrading to the character of woman.' In the course of Lectures on Shakespeare delivered in the year 1818, Coleridge pointed especially to the artifice of Isabella, and her seeming consent to the suit of Angelo, as circumstances which tended to lower the character of the female He then only called "Measure for Measure" the "least agreeable" of Shakespeare's dramas. sex. 3 With reference to the name, we may remark that the expression "Measure for measure" was proverbial, and we meet with it in the following line, "Measure for measure must be answered," in "The True Tragedy of Richard Duke of York," 4to, 1595, p. 151 of the reprint made for the Shakespeare Society in 1843. See also Vol. iv. p. 156. Lords, Gentlemen, Guards, Officers, and other Attendants. SCENE, Vienna. 1 This list of characters (with the omission of "a Justice") is appended to the play in the folio of 1623. MEASURE FOR MEASURE. ACT I. SCENE I. An Apartment in the DUKE's Palace. Enter DUKE, ESCALUS, Lords, and Attendants. Duke. Escalus! Escal. My lord. Duke. Of government the properties to unfold My strength can give you: then, no more remains, And let them work'. The nature of our people, Our city's institutions, and the terms For common justice, y' are as pregnant in LISTS] Bounds or limits: often so used: see particularly Vol. ii. p. then, no more remains, But ADD to your sufficiency your worth, 685. And let them work.] We know of no better way of overcoming the difficulty presented in the opening of this play, than adopting the text offered in the corr. fo. 1632, and that we present to our readers: the passage has usually been printed thus, from the folio, 1623: "then, no more remains, But that, to your sufficiency, as your worth is able, And let them work." This cannot have been what the poet wrote; and what the old annotator on our fo. 1632 tells us was the text in his day is not merely clear and intelligible, but harmonious and correct as regards the verse. In a preceding line "Since I am put to know" of the folio, 1623, might have remained, but that, on the same authority, we are instructed to read "Since I am apt to know," which certainly fills the place, and answers the purpose better. [Giring it. As art and practice hath enriched any That we remember. There is our commission, From which we would not have you warp.-Call hither, I say, bid come before us Angelo.— What figure of us think you he will bear? [Exit an Attendant. For, you must know, we have with special soul Lent him our terror, drest him with our love, To undergo such ample grace and honour, Ang. Always obedient to your grace's will, I come to know your pleasure. There is a kind of character in thy life, As if we had them not. Spirits are not finely touch'd, Herself the glory of a creditor, Both thanks and use. But I do bend my speech To one that can my part in him advertise": 3 4 [Tendering his commission'. THEM on thee.] The old copy erroneously reads, "they on thee." 5 Both thanks and USE.] "Use" of old signified interest of money. To one that can my part in him advertise:] i. e. To one, says Malone, who is already informed as to the duties of my office. 7 Tendering his commission.] This stage-direction from the corr. fo. 1632 may be said to settle the question, argued between Johnson, Tyrwhitt, and Steevens, whether at these words the Duke offered the commission to Angelo: it appears, In our remove, be thou at full ourself; Live in thy tongue and heart. Old Escalus, Ang. Now, good my lord, Let there be some more test made of my metal, Be stamp'd upon it. Duke. No more evasion: We have with a leaven'd and prepared choice Ang. Yet, give leave, my lord, That we may bring you something on the way. Nor need you, on mine honour, have to do So to enforce, or qualify the laws As to your soul seems good. Give me your hand. That does affect it. Once more, fare you well. Ang. The heavens give safety to your purposes! [Giving it. Escal. Lead forth, and bring you back in happiness! [Exit. Escal. I shall desire you, sir, to give me leave To have free speech with you; and it concerns me A power I have, but of what strength and nature by a subsequent stage-direction, that Angelo did not take the instrument from the Duke's hand until afterwards: he perhaps, at first, showed modest hesitation. |