Of pray'rs to saints, confession in the ear, Of calling her, in Pagau terms, Heav'n's Queen, Such as to mention would be tedious here, The priests of Rome (like various other priests) Were oft a subtle and tyrannic band, Ambitious, cruel, proud, giv'n to revenge Deliberate, which nothing could appease, Heav'n on their tongues, but hell within their hearts; Oft void of all those elegant desires, Those polish'd manners, and that social ease, Sir Richard Musgrave says, "The remission of sins became so systematic, and such a constant and regular source of revenue to the holy see, that they were reduced to a schedule, in a book of rates, with the sums corresponding, for which they were to be remitted. Every crime that human depravity can commit is inserted in this book. Of this work, entitled Taxes of the Roman Chancery, different editions were published for the use of Roman Catholic states: one at Rome, by Marcellus Silber, in 1514; one at Cologne, in 1515; three at Paris, in 1520, 1545, 1625; one at Venice, in the sixth volume of the Oceanus Juris, in 1523. The Protestant princes published one among their Reasons for rejecting the Council of Trent. See for this, Heideggeri Myster. Babylon. tom. ii. p. 350." Memoirs of the different Rebellions in Ireland, with a particular Detail of that which broke out the 23d of May, 1797. Compiled from original Affidavits, and other authentic Docu ments. By Sir Richard Musgrave, Bart. Dublin, printed 1801, 4to. pages 18 and 19. Au important discovery has been very lately published, that there is an edition of the book entitled "Taxe Cancellariæ Apostolicæ❞ in the Cheetham library in Manchester. See that interesting work "The Protestant Advocate," for October, 1813. Archbishop Tillotson quotes the words of an Arabian physician, who said, "I have travelled over the world, and have found divers sects; but so sottish a sect or law I never found, as is the sect of the Christians, because with their own teeth they devour the God whom they worship." Cicero, in his De Natura Deorum, supposed that such an absurdity could scarcely exist among man. kind. T Which woman, only lovely woman, gives; Through them, in dark and trying times, arose i They went in feral indignation forth Whence with a voice his tortur'd martyrs cry, M Upon that city which doth thirst for blood!" Isaiah, lxiii. This passage in Isaiah seems to refer to "the days of vengeance," (Luke, xxi. 22,) to the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus; but may be somewhat applicable to other calamities. ↑ Mantuan formerly said of the pope, Ense potens gemino, cujus vestigia adorant, For in one hour is thy destruction come!” Angels, apostles, prophets, martyrs, saints, It is generally allowed by Protestant commentators, that the years of Papal usurpation are 1260 prophetical years; but they differ about the time when these years commence. At the expiration of these years they think Rome (which St. John appears to mean by Ba. bylon, as he calls Babylon the Great City, seated upon seven moun. tains, which in his time reigned over the kings of the earth) will be destroyed; but they differ in opinion about the manner of its destruction. The celebrated Joseph Mede, who spent twenty years in the study of the sacred prophecies, supposes that Rome will be "sacked and burnt." Mr. Zouch, a man of deep learning and inquiry, supposes it will be destroyed by the immediate hand of Heaven. Other commentators suppose that St. John only means the abolition of the power of the popedom. The event will manifest who formed the truest conjectures. Sir Isaac Newton supposes that the 1260 years of Papal usurpation commence from the year 755, when Pipin of France made a grant of the temporal dominion of Rome, upon the destruction of the exar chate of Ravennah. The celebrated Dr. Samuel Clarke and Mr. Moses Lowman are also of this opinion. Mr. Joseph Mede, a man of a penetrating genius and of profound erudition, was inclined to think that the 1260 years of Papal usurpation commence "hundreds of years before the times of Pipin and Charlemagne." It might not be injudicious, perhaps, to strike a line between Mr. Mede and his illustrious opponents, and to suppose the æra of the commencement of Papal usurpation was at the beginning of the seventh century, when the Emperor Phocas made certain concessions to the popes. If 606 be the year for the commencement of the Papal power, its downfal will be in the year 1866, or 1848. There is a very strong argument, as I conceive, to show that Sir Isaac Newton may have been mistaken in fixing this æra so late as the year 755, from its making the downfal of the Papal power subsequent to the downfal of the Mahometan. I think the Mahometans were appointed to be the scourges of Popery, and that the Mahometau was to continue the same period of time as the Papal power, though it commenced after the Papal. If we fix the æra of the commencement of the Mahometan power at the time of Mahomet's flight, at the Hegira, in the year 622, or at the taking of Jerusalem by the Saracens, in 637 (and I do not see how we can fix it later), the downfal of the Mahometan power will be about the year 1864, or about the year 1879; or about the year 1882, or 1897, if these are like our common years (which is sup. posed by Sir Isaac Newton) and not strictly prophetical years of 360 days each. The piper's, harper's, and musician's voice, Of many a martyr'd and a meek-soul'd saint. How should the advocates for Christ awake, Thick as the sands upon the sea-beat shore, But in the islands of the Indian Sea, |