Sayfadaki görseller
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors]

chontici.-3. And the Seleucians and Hermians.-4. And Manichees
and Paulicians.-5. What opinion the Messalians or Euchites had of
Baptism.

Of the ancient form of Baptism: and of such Heretics as
altered or corrupted it.

Of the subjects of Baptism, or an account of what Persons

were anciently allowed to be baptised. Where particularly

of Infant-Baptism.

SECT. 1. Why the question about the Administrators of Baptism is here

omitted.—2. Who were anciently reckoned the proper subjects of Bap-

tism. Where of the corrupt Custom of baptising inanimate things, as

Bells in the Roman Church.-3. Baptism not to be given to the dead.

4. Nor to the Living for the Dead. Where of the Apostles meaning,

of being baptised for the Dead, 1 Cor. xv. 29.-5. Proofs of Infant-

Baptism from the ancient records of the Church.-6. From Clemens

Romanus and Hermes Pastor.-7. From Justin Martyr.-8. And the

Author ofthe Recognitions, contemporary with Justin Martyr.-9. From

Irenæus.-10. And Tertullian.-11. And Origen.-12. And Cyprian, with

the Council of Carthage under him.-13. Infant-Baptism not to be de-

layed to the eighth day, after the example of Circumcision. Nor till

three Years, as Gregory Nazianzen would have had it.-14. Yet in

some Churches it was deferred to the Time of an approaching Festival.-

15. A resolution of some questions concerning Infant-Baptism. Whether

children might be baptised, when only one Parent was Christian?-

16. Whether the Children of excommunicated Parents might be bap-

tised?-17. Whether exposed Children, whose Parents were unknown,

might be baptised?-18. Whether the Children of Jews or Heathens

might be baptised in any Case whatsoever?-19. Whether Children,

born while their Parents were Heathen, might be baptised.

« ÖncekiDevam »