How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics and the Ur-text of Racial Politics
University of Michigan Press, 2002 - 320 sayfa
It is widely asserted that the Victorian sages attacked classical economics from a humanistic or egalitarian perspective, calling it "the dismal science," and that their attack is relevant to modern discussions of market society. David M. Levy here demonstrates that these assertions are simply false: political economy became "dismal" because Carlyle, Ruskin, and Dickens were horrified at the idea that systems of slavery were being replaced by systems in which individuals were allowed to choose their own paths in life. At a minimum, they argued, "we" white people ought to be directing the lives of "them," people of color.
Economists of the time argued, on the other hand, that people of color were to be protected by the rule of law--hence the moniker "the dismal science."
A startling image from 1893, which is reproduced in full color on this book's jacket, shows Ruskin killing someone who appears to be nonwhite. A close look reveals that the victim is reading "The Dismal Science."
Levy discusses this image at length and also includes in his text weblinks to Carlyle's "Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question" and to Mill's response, demonstrating that these are central documents in British classical economics. He explains Adam Smith's egalitarian foundations, contrasting Smith's approach to the hierarchical alternative proposed by Carlyle. Levy also examines various visual representations of this debate and provides an illuminating discussion of Smith's "katallactics," the science of exchange, comparing it with the foundations of modern neoclassical economics.
How the Dismal Science Got Its Name also introduces the notion of "rational choice scholarship" to explain how attacks on market economics from a context in which racial slavery was idealized have been interpreted as attacks on market economics from a humanistic or egalitarian context. Thus it will greatly appeal to economists, political scientists, philosophers, students of Victorian literature, and historians.
David M. Levy is Associate Professor of Economics and Research Associate, Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University.
Kullanıcılar ne diyor? - Eleştiri yazın
Her zamanki yerlerde hiçbir eleştiri bulamadık.
Poets Come Bringing Death to Friends of the Dismal Science
Ecce Homo Symbols Make the Man
Beginning with an Exchange or with a Command?
A Rational Choice Approach to Scholarship
Market Order or Hierarchy?
Debating Racial Quackery
Economic Texts as Apocrypha
Hard Times and the Moral Equivalence of Markets and Slavery
The Katallactic Moment
Diğer baskılar - Tümünü görüntüle
American approbation argue argument attack become believe better British called Carlyle Carlyle's chapter choice Christian claim classical common consider context course criticism debate described Dickens discussion dismal distance doctrine economics economists edition English equal evidence exchange exist expected explain fact give greatest Greatest Happiness Principle happiness Hard human important individual interest interpretation issue John judgment labour language less Levy live look masters mean Mill moral nature Negro object observe past perhaps person political position possible present principle problem propose question quoted race racial rational reader reason reference require response result Ruskin scholars seems sense slavery slaves Smith social society spectator suggest supposed texts theory things thought tion trade truth understand utilitarianism Wealth of Nations well-being