IV. Note of the judgment of the Lord Chancellor (Lough- borough), in the appeal Ommanney and others v. Bingham and others, (Domicil of Admiral Sir Charles Douglas) 18th March, 1796
AGNEW U. AGNEW, 449, 450. 454. 466.
Annandale, Marquis, case of his domicil, 159.
Anstruther v. Chalmer, 189.228. Armour v. Campbell, 237. Austin v. Austin, 216.
Babington v. Greenwood, 356. Balfour v. Scott, 161. 203. 217. 221.
Ball v. Smith, 323. Ballantine v. Golding, 235. Balmain, Lady, her case, 394. 403.
Baynes v. Earl of Sutherland, 113. Beard v. Beard, 351. Beggia, Sidy Hamet Benamor, case of, 285.
Bempde v. Johnstone (the Mar- quis of Annandale's case), 159. Bennett v. Bennett's trustees, 227.
Blackborough v. Davis, 335. Bowers v. Littlewood, 334. Bowker v. Hunter, 39. Brack v. Hog, 228. Breadalbane, Earl of, v. Innes
and others, 260. Brodie v. Barry, 216. 218. 220. 226.
Brown and Duff v. Bisset, 256. Brown v. Brown, 92. 101. Brown v. Farndell, 336. Browne v. Phillips, 279. Brown's trustees v. Brown, 192. Bruce v. Bruce, 101. 117. 118. 152.161.188. 203. 236. 237. 310. 395, 396. 400. 403.
Burn v. Cole, 277. 279. 293. 295.
Burnet v. Burntfield, 267. Burnet v. Mould, 364.
Calvin's case, 86.
Cameron and others v. Mackie, 228.
Chace v. Box, 358.
Chiene v. Sykes, 182.
Choiseul, Comte, case of, 176. 177.
Cholmley v. Cholmley, 104. 107. 181. 310. 350.
Civil v. Rich, 357, 358. Cleaver v. Spurling, 356. 358. Clerk v. Brebner, 262. Clermont de St. Aignan, Made-
moiselle, case of, 176, 177. Colville v. Lauder, 166. 188. Comber's case, 305. Courtagnon, M., case of, 181. Cox v. Belitha, 357. 360. Craigie v. Gardner, 267. Crooke v. Watt, 334.
Cunha, Countess da, goods of, 291. 295.
Cunyngham v. Gainer, 219, 220. Curling v. Thornton, 287. 297. 302.
Davers v. Dewes, 323.
Davidson v. Elcherson, 97. 102. Dean v. Lord Delaware, 358. Doe, demise of Birtwhistle, v. Vardill, 86.
Dormoy, Ann, goods of, 304. Douglas, Sir Charles, case of his
domicil, 152. 161. 468.
Morris v. Burroughs, 360. Morris v. Wright, 100. Morrison's assignees v. Watt, 238.246.
Mortimer v. Lorimer, 97. 102: Munroe v. Douglas, 152. 182. 186.
Murray v. Smith, 219.
Nasmyth v. Hare, 91. 283. Neale v. Cottingham, 234. Newland's executors v. Chal- mers's trustees, 221. Newsome v. Bowyer, 363. Norbury v. Richards, 335. Northey v. Strange, 360.
Odwin v. Forbes, 76. 181. 240. Ommanney and others v. Bing- ham (Sir Charles Douglas's case), 152. 161. 468. Onslow v. Onslow, 107. 181. 310. 350. 351. 356. Otto v. Lewis, 115.
Palmer v. Garard, 323. Parish v. Rhones, 236. Paterre, Marquis de, case of, 181. Petit v. Smith, 320. Pett v. Pett, 32. 334. Pewtress v. Thorold, 236. Phillips and another v. Hunter and others, 235. Pickering v. Stamford, 47. Pipon v. Pipon, 103. 108-125. 279. 309, 310. Pool v. Wishaw, 335. Potinger v. Wightman, 196. Potter v. Brown, 237. Pratt v. Pratt, 325. Purvis v. Chisholm, 85. 312.
Read, Lieut. Col., goods of, 294. Redshaw v. Brasier, 356. Rex v. Inhabitants of Barton Turfe, 199.
Rex v. Inhabitants of Oulton,
Rex v. Raines, 32. 320. Rich v. Rich, 357. Rob v. French, 255-260. Royal Bank of Scotland v. Scott, Smith, Stein, and Co. 239. Robertson v. Gilchrist, 272. Robertson v. Macvean, 220. Robertson v. Robertson, 219. Russel v. 90.
Rutter v. Rutter, 356.
Saul v. his Creditors, 147. Scarth v. Bishop of London, 280. Shaw v. Lewins, 89.
Sill v. Worswick, 165. 232–235. Simons v. Milman, 306. Smith v. Milles, 305. Snelling's case, 28. Solomons v. Ross, 234. Somerville v. Somerville, 46. 105. 107.168.198, 199. 212.
Stein's case, 239.
Steuart v. Macdonald, 272. Stanley v. Bernes, 277.290. 297. 302.
Stanley v. Stanley, 36. 332. 333. Stapleton v. Sherrard, 341. Strothers v. Reid, 236. Suffolk, Duchess of, her case, 332.380.
Thomson v. Tabor, 236. Thorne v. Watkins, 103-112. 114. 116. 125. 309. 310. 404. 406. Thornbrough v. Baker, 363. Tiffin v. Tiffin, 363. Tomkyns v. Ladbroke, 402. Tourton v. Flower, 305. Trent and Brown v. Duff, 258. Trotter v. Trotter, 219.
Vasie v. Glover, 236. Veitch v. Irving, 267.
Wilkinson v. Atkinson, 338. Wallace, Robert Alex. Paterson,
« ÖncekiDevam » |