The Peace Problem: Address on the Peace Problem, Carnegie Institute, April 27, 1916, 64. cilt1917 - 13 sayfa |
Sık kullanılan terimler ve kelime öbekleri
Abbé de St Aix-la-Chapelle Alexander Alexander's allied ambassador in London amicable processes Amphictyonic applied armies attitude Austria Bentham Britain British Castlereagh central body COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY commission of inquiry common interest Congress contracting parties controversy council declared Denmark disputes effect enemy enforce peace England English established European exemplified exempt ference France French Revolution functions guaranty Hague HARVARD LAW LIBRARY held Holy Alliance honor human independent internal order international arbitration international police involved JANUARY 30 JOHN BASSETT MOORE joint high commission justiciable justified later law of conquest league to enforce liberty Majesty's Government manifested maritime code means mediation ment Napoleonic wars nature Norman November 20 ously peace of Europe PEACE PROBLEM Permanent Court Pierre political powerful sovereign practical application present preservation of peace proposed putes Quadruple Alliance quarrel question regard religous Russia Russian ambassador SENATE settlement take up arms territory tion treaties union United world an example
Popüler pasajlar
Sayfa 8 - Vergennes used to hate us - and so things are getting back to a wholesome state again. Every nation for itself and God for us all.
Sayfa 12 - July, 1899, provided, nevertheless, that they do not affect the vital interests, the independence, or the honor of the two Contracting States, and do not concern the interests of third parties.
Sayfa 12 - ... which are justiciable in their nature by reason of being susceptible of decision by the application of the principles of law or equity...
Sayfa 11 - Alabama and other vessels issuing from British ports, appears to render further discussion of the merits of the question unnecessary. It is only to preclude the possibility of any inference growing out of an omission to notice it that I beg permission to make a single remark in connection with your lordship's observation...
Sayfa 7 - ... to renew their Meetings at fixed periods, either under the immediate auspices of the Sovereigns themselves, or by their respective Ministers, for the purpose of consulting upon their common interests, and for the consideration of the measures which at each of those periods shall be considered the most salutary for the repose and prosperity of Nations, and for the maintenance of the Peace of Europe.
Sayfa 7 - It is clear that at this period the Alliance was looked upon even by British statesmen as something more than a mere union of the Great Powers for preserving peace on the basis of the treaties; and in effect, during its short session the Conference acted, not only as a European representative body, but as a sort of European Supreme Court, which heard appeals and received petitions of all kinds from sovereigns and their subjects alike.
Sayfa 12 - of a legal nature, or relating to the interpretation of treaties, . . . provided, nevertheless, that they do not affect the vital interests, the independence or the honor of the two contracting States, and do not concern the interests of third parties.
Sayfa 7 - Till a system of administering Europe by a general alliance of all its states can be reduced to some practical form, all notions of a general and unqualified guarantee must be abandoned, and the states must be left to rely for their security upon the justice and wisdom of their respective systems and the aid of other states according to the law of nations.
Sayfa 9 - It was an affair which challenged the intervention of the civil tribunal, but being neglected by the Magistrates the Normans applied to their King, (Philip le Bel) who with neglect still more unpardonable, desired them to take their own revenge. They instantly put to sea, and seizing the first English ship they could find, hung up several of the crew, and some dogs at the same time, at the mast head.
Sayfa 12 - ... as to whether a difference was of this nature, this question was to be referred to a joint high commission of inquiry, whose vote in favor of arbitration was to be conclusive, if concurred in by all or all but one of the members. The United States Senate amended these treaties (1) by requiring the advice and consent of the Senate for any and every submission, (2) by taking from the joint high commission of inquiry the power to decide that a difference was justiciable, and (3) by declaring that...