Sayfadaki görseller
PDF
ePub

INDEX OF CASES.

AGNEW v. AGNEW, 449, 450. 454.
466.

Annandale, Marquis, case of his

domicil, 159.

Anstruther v. Chalmer, 189.228.
Armour v. Campbell, 237.
Austin v. Austin, 216.

Babington v. Greenwood, 356.
Balfour v. Scott, 161. 203. 217.
221.

Ball v. Smith, 323.
Ballantine v. Golding, 235.
Balmain, Lady, her case, 394.
403.

Baynes v. Earl of Sutherland, 113.
Beard v. Beard, 351.
Beggia, Sidy Hamet Benamor,
case of, 285.

Bempde v. Johnstone (the Mar-
quis of Annandale's case), 159.
Bennett v. Bennett's trustees,
227.

Blackborough v. Davis, 335.
Bowers v. Littlewood, 334.
Bowker v. Hunter, 39.
Brack v. Hog, 228.
Breadalbane, Earl of, v. Innes

and others, 260.

Brodie v. Barry, 216. 218. 220.
226.

Brown and Duff v. Bisset, 256.
Brown v. Brown, 92. 101.
Brown v. Farndell, 336.
Browne v. Phillips, 279.
Brown's trustees v. Brown, 192.
Bruce v. Bruce, 101. 117. 118.
152.161.188. 203. 236. 237.
310. 395, 396. 400. 403.

Burn v. Cole, 277. 279. 293.
295.

Burnet v. Burntfield, 267.
Burnet v. Mould, 364.

Calvin's case, 86.

Cameron and others v. Mackie,
228.

Chace v. Box, 358.

Chiene v. Sykes, 182.

Choiseul, Comte, case of, 176.
177.

Cholmley v. Cholmley, 104. 107.

181. 310. 350.

Civil v. Rich, 357, 358.
Cleaver v. Spurling, 356. 358.
Clerk v. Brebner, 262.
Clermont de St. Aignan, Made-

moiselle, case of, 176, 177.
Colville v. Lauder, 166. 188.
Comber's case, 305.
Courtagnon, M., case of, 181.
Cox v. Belitha, 357. 360.
Craigie v. Gardner, 267.
Crooke v. Watt, 334.

Cunha, Countess da, goods of,
291.295.

Cunyngham v. Gainer, 219, 220.
Curling v. Thornton, 287. 297.
302.

Davers v. Dewes, 323.

Davidson v. Elcherson, 97. 102.
Dean v. Lord Delaware, 358.
Doe, demise of Birtwhistle, v.
Vardill, 86.

Dormoy, Ann, goods of, 304.
Douglas, Sir Charles, case of his
domicil, 152. 161. 468.

[blocks in formation]

Morris v. Burroughs, 360.
Morris v. Wright, 100.
Morrison's assignees v. Watt,
238.246.

Mortimer v. Lorimer, 97. 102:
Munroe v. Douglas, 152. 182.
186.

Murray v. Smith, 219.

Nasmyth v. Hare, 91. 283.
Neale v. Cottingham, 234.
Newland's executors v. Chal
mers's trustees, 221.
Newsome v. Bowyer, 363.
Norbury v. Richards, 335.
Northey v. Strange, 360.

Odwin v. Forbes, 76. 181. 240.
Ommanney and others v. Bing-
ham (Sir Charles Douglas's
case), 152. 161. 468.
Onslow v. Onslow, 107. 181.
310. 350. 351. 356.
Otto v. Lewis, 115.

Palmer v. Garard, 323.
Parish v. Rhones, 236.
Paterre, Marquis de, case of, 181.
Petit v. Smith, 320.
Pett v. Pett, 32. 334.
Pewtress v. Thorold, 236.
Phillips and another v. Hunter
and others, 235.
Pickering v. Stamford, 47.
Pipon v. Pipon, 103. 108-125.
279. 309, 310.
Pool v. Wishaw, 335.
Potinger v. Wightman, 196.
Potter v. Brown, 237.
Pratt, 325.

Pratt v.

Purvis v. Chisholm, 85. 312.

Read, Lieut. Col., goods of, 294.
Redshaw v. Brasier, 356.
Rex v. Inhabitants of Barton
Turfe, 199.

Rex v. Inhabitants of Oulton,
ibid.

[blocks in formation]

Saul v. his Creditors, 147.
Scarth v. Bishop of London, 280.
Shaw v. Lewins, 89.

Sill v. Worswick, 165. 232-235.
Simons v. Milman, 306.
Smith v. Milles, 305.
Snelling's case, 28.
Solomons v. Ross, 234.

Somerville v. Somerville, 46. 105.
107.168. 198, 199. 212.

Stein's case, 239.

Steuart v. Macdonald, 272.
Stanley v. Bernes, 277. 290. 297.
302.

Stanley v. Stanley, 36. 332. 333.
Stapleton v. Sherrard, 341.
Strothers v. Reid, 236.

Suffolk, Duchess of, her case,
332.380.

Thomson v. Tabor, 236.
Thorne v. Watkins, 103-112.
114. 116. 125. 309. 310. 404.
406.
Thornbrough v. Baker, 363.
Tiffin v. Tiffin, 363.
Tomkyns v. Ladbroke, 402.
Tourton v. Flower, 305.

Trent and Brown v. Duff, 258.
Trotter v. Trotter, 219.

Vasie v. Glover, 236.
Veitch v. Irving, 267.

Wilkinson v. Atkinson, 338.
Wallace, Robert Alex. Paterson,
case of, 201. 275.

[blocks in formation]

Page 232. line 25., for "remembrances," read " incumbrances."
364. line 1., for "Sir James Stewart," read "Sir John Nisbet."
384. note (o), for "Ovory," read "Ivory."

-

The case of Doe on the demise of Birtwhistle v. Vardill
(noticed p. 86.) has again attracted the attention, which is due to its
importance, as a question of international law. On the 2d of
September, 1835, the House of Lords, on the motion of Lord
Brougham, ordered the cause "to be further argued before the
Judges in the next Session."

A TREATISE

ON THE

LAW OF PERSONAL SUCCESSION.

INTRODUCTION.

THERE is no branch of the law of more general interest, than that which relates to the right of Succession in moveable, or personal estate. In modern times, this species of property has attained to a degree of importance which was formerly unknown, by reason of the vast increase of the public securities of the nation, and of its agriculture, commerce, and manufactures.

It is now the general rule, in every part of the realm (a), that the law of that part of the kingdom in which the person dying possessed of personal estate had his residence, or legal domicil, at the time of his death, shall regulate the right of succession to such personal estate. This rule, in regard to the domicil, was not assented to or fixed in Scotland without much inquiry, and many conflicting decisions, in the courts of law of that country.

The other rules of the law of succession in personal

(a) It will be seen in the sequel, that an exception must be made in regard to the succession of a freeman of London, under the custom of that city.

B

« ÖncekiDevam »