 | James Seth - 1926 - 284 sayfa
...and would not resign it for any quantity of the other pleasure which their nature is capable of. ... No intelligent human being would consent to be a fool, no instructed person 1 ' Utilitarianism,' p. 53. 2 Ibid., p. 11. would be an ignoramus, no person of feeling and conscience... | |
 | 1908 - 588 sayfa
...used in this connection in the European sense. Yet John Stuart Mill is probably right when he says : " Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...animals, for a promise of the fullest allowance of beastly pleasures; no intelligent human being would consent to be a fool, no instructed person would... | |
 | David DeGrazia - 1996 - 320 sayfa
...Applying this standard to the issue of the comparative value of whole lives, he states that "[f ]ew human creatures would consent to be changed into any...animals for a promise of the fullest allowance of the beast's pleasures. . . . "5S Mill's conclusion is noteworthy for several reasons. First, he apparently... | |
 | Hans Theodorus Blokland - 1997 - 340 sayfa
...both, do give a most marked preference to the manner of existence which employs their higher faculties. Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...promise of the fullest allowance of a beast's pleasures. (Mill 1861:280) This can be explained by pride, by his penchant for or love of freedom and independence,... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1998 - 376 sayfa
...exclusively. Is he then guilty of error, or infirmity of character? Doubtless Mill is right when he says 'Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...promise of the fullest allowance of a beast's pleasures' (p. 211). Apart from the somewhat metaphysical considerations adduced by Mill in support of this claim... | |
 | Gerald F. Gaus - 1999 - 268 sayfa
...conscious of them do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification. . . . Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...beast's pleasures; no intelligent human being would be content to be a fool; no instructed person would be an ignoramus. ... It is better to be a human... | |
 | Jamie Mayerfeld Associate Professor of Political Science University of Washington - 1999 - 254 sayfa
...and what kind of faculties we want to develop: Few human creatures would consent to be changed inro any of the lower animals for a promise of the fullest...human being would consent to be a fool, no instructed persun would be an ignoramus, no persun of feeling and conscience would be selfish and hase, even though... | |
 | Janet McCracken - 2001 - 362 sayfa
...claims, that there is "a marked preference to the manner of existence which employs the higher faculties. Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...of the fullest allowance of a beast's pleasures... .' 4 Mill's "quality" distinction does not address the facts of ordinary experience. Consequently,... | |
 | Claudia Card - 2005 - 302 sayfa
...as one who is acquainted with and capable of appreciating both pleasures to be compared, he writes: Few human creatures would consent to be changed into...intelligent human being would consent to be a fool . . . even though they should be persuaded that the fool... is better satisfied with his lot than they... | |
 | Richard J. Norman - 2004 - 192 sayfa
...what happiness consists in for a human being we have to look at what it is that makes us human. 2 S Few human creatures would consent to be changed into any * • of the lower animals, for the promise of the fullest allowance .2 of a beast's pleasures. ... A being of higher faculties requires... | |
| |
Few human creatures would consent to be changed into any of the lower animals, for a promise of the fullest allowance of a beast's pleasures : no intelligent human being would consent to be a fool, no instructed person would be an ignoramus, no person... 
