The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people, as equally true; by the philosopher, as equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful. The Quarterly Review - Sayfa 241840Tam görünüm - Bu kitap hakkında
| David Gress - 2010 - 632 sayfa
[ Maalesef, bu sayfanın içeriği kısıtlanmıştır ] | |
| Sheldon S. Wolin - 2004 - 786 sayfa
[ Maalesef, bu sayfanın içeriği kısıtlanmıştır ] | |
| Hugh Johnson - 2004 - 268 sayfa
[ Maalesef, bu sayfanın içeriği kısıtlanmıştır ] | |
| Hans-Georg Ziebertz - 2005 - 288 sayfa
...it this way, 'the various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people as equally true; by the philosopher,...equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful' (chapter 2). There is a sense in which the relativism of religion within modern European society may... | |
| Fisher Humphreys - 2005 - 226 sayfa
...once wrote, "The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people as equally true; by the philosopher,...false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful." 1 I am glad that Jesus did not hold any of those opinions. He did not say that all religions are equally... | |
| Leopold Damrosch - 2005 - 586 sayfa
..."The various modes of worship which prevailed in the Roman world," Gibbon wrote, "were all considered by the people as equally true, by the philosopher...equally false, and by the magistrate as equally useful." Rousseau did care about belief, and there is some truth to Germaine de Staël's comment that he was... | |
| Richard Zera - 2005 - 316 sayfa
...Jonson (1572-1637) The various modes of worship which prevailed in the Roman world were all considered by the people as equally true; by the philosopher...equally false; and by the magistrate as equally useful. — Gibbon Fanaticism in religion is the alliance of the passions she condemns with the dogmas she... | |
| Simon Blackburn - 2005 - 272 sayfa
...described by Gibbon: 'The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people, as equally true; by the philosopher,...as equally false; and by the magistrate as equally useful.'1 But is it really the cranky, oversensitive philosopher who spoils the party? William Clifford... | |
| |