 | Philip Schaff - 2007 - 593 sayfa
...periods. But after saying that " it was excluded," he shows also, how. How then does he say it was excluded ? " By what law ? of works ? Nay, but by the law of faith." See he calls the faith also a law, delighting to keep to the names, and so allay the seeming novelty.... | |
 | Philip Schaff - 2007 - 593 sayfa
...every sort of cure was found unavailing, Ver. 27. " Where is bnasting then ? it is excluded," he says. ry, nay, they are exceedingly in accord. For when the o Paul is at great pains to show that faith is mighty to a degree which was never even fancied of the... | |
 | Steven Channing - 2008 - 390 sayfa
...that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Another doctrine... | |
 | Steven Channing - 2008 - 390 sayfa
...that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Another doctrine... | |
| |
Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay; but by the law of faith. 
