| Edward Beal - 1908 - 766 sayfa
...the party, it follows the law of the person. The owner in an}' country may dispose of his personal property. If he dies, it is not the law of the country in which the property is, hut the law of the country of which he was a subject, that will regulate the succession. For instance,... | |
| 1909 - 1234 sayfa
...of the party, it follows the law of the person. The owner in any country may dispose of his personal property. If he dies, it is not the law of the country...was a subject, that will regulate the succession." The exceptions to this general rule are so numerous that it hardly now deserves to be called a rule,... | |
| Victoria. Supreme Court - 1882 - 1038 sayfa
...of the party. It follows the law of the person. An owner in any country may dispose of his personal property. If he dies it is not the law of the country...was a subject, that will regulate the succession." The legal effect of these words has been formulated in the wellknown maxim mobilia sequuntur personam.... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1874 - 682 sayfa
...of the party. It follows the law of the person. The owner in any country may dispose of his personal property. • If he dies, it is not the law of the...was a subject, that will regulate the succession." . Indeed, so universally has it been treated as a part of the jus gentium, and thus incorporated into... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 790 sayfa
...of it either by succession or by the act of the party. It follows the law of the person. If he die, it is not the law of the country in which the property...was a subject, that will regulate the succession." "And this doctrine has been constantly maintained in England and America with unbroken confidence."... | |
| Alabama. Supreme Court - 1850 - 920 sayfa
...personal property, wherever it may be, in a manner authorised by the law of that country, and when he dies it is not the law of the country in which the property is, but the law of the country in which he was domiciled that will regulate the succession. Whatever contrariety of opinion may formerly... | |
| |